This example uses the Failure.jmp sample data table, which contains failure data and a frequency column. It lists causes of failure during the fabrication of integrated circuits and the number of times each type of defect occurred. A threshold value of 2 is specified for this example.
1.
|
2.
|
3.
|
4.
|
5.
|
6.
|
7.
|
Click OK.
|
Pareto Plot with a Threshold Count of 2 displays the plot after specifying a count of 2. All causes with counts 2 or fewer are combined into the final bar labeled 4 Others.
8.
|
To separate the combined bars into original categories as shown in Pareto Plot with Separated Causes, select Causes > Separate Causes.
|
This example uses the Failures.jmp sample data table, which contains failure data and a frequency column. It lists causes of failure during the fabrication of integrated circuits and the number of times each type of defect occurred for two processes. A constant sample size of 1000 is specified for this example.
1.
|
2.
|
3.
|
4.
|
5.
|
6.
|
7.
|
8.
|
Click OK.
|
9.
|
This example uses the Failuressize.jmp sample data table, which contains failure data and a frequency column. It lists causes of failure during the fabrication of integrated circuits and the number of times each type of defect occurred for two processes. Among the other causes (Oxide Defect, Silicon Defect, and so on) is a cause labeled size. Specifying size as the cause code designates the rows as size rows.
1.
|
2.
|
3.
|
4.
|
5.
|
6.
|
7.
|
8.
|
Click OK.
|
9.
|
Select Count Analysis > Per Unit Rates and Count Analysis > Test Rates Across Groups from the red triangle menu.
|
This example uses the Failure2.jmp sample data table. This table records failures in a sample of capacitors manufactured before cleaning a tube in the diffusion furnace and in a sample manufactured after cleaning the furnace. For each type of failure, the variable clean identifies the samples with the values “before” or “after.”
1.
|
2.
|
3.
|
4.
|
5.
|
6.
|
Click OK.
|
One-way Comparative Pareto Plot displays the side-by-side plots for each value of the variable, clean.
The horizontal and vertical axes are scaled identically for both plots. The bars in the first plot are in descending order of the y-axis values and determine the order for all cells.
7.
|
Rearrange the order of the plots by clicking the title (after) in the first tile and dragging it to the title of the next tile (before).
|
A comparison of these two plots shows a reduction in oxide defects after cleaning. However, the plots are easier to interpret when presented as the before-and-after plot shown in One-way Comparative Pareto Plot with Reordered Cells. Note that the order of the causes changes to reflect the order based on the first cell.
This example uses the Failure3.jmp sample data table. The data monitors production samples before and after a furnace cleaning for three days for a capacitor manufacturing process. The data table has a column called date with values OCT 1, OCT 2, and OCT 3.
1.
|
2.
|
3.
|
4.
|
5.
|
6.
|
Click OK.
|
Two-way Comparative Pareto Plot displays the Pareto plot with a two-way layout of plots that show each level of both X variables. The upper left cell is called the key cell. Its bars are arranged in descending order. The bars in the other cells are in the same order as the key cell.
7.
|
Click Contamination and Metallization in the key cell and the bars for the corresponding categories highlight in all other cells.
|
The Pareto plot shown in Two-way Comparative Pareto Plot illustrates highlighting the vital few. In each cell of the two-way comparative plot, the bars representing the two most frequently occurring problems are selected. Contamination and Metallization are the two vital categories in all cells. After furnace cleaning, Contamination is less of a problem.