Customer Story

How to reinvent the wheel – or something even older

Samson Rope’s analytics-savvy engineers reimagine one of the oldest technologies in human history: rope

Samson Rope

ChallengeGain market share in an increasingly consolidated industry; differentiate products and services on a global scale.
SolutionRespond proactively to new market opportunities with an innovative R&D program accelerated by advanced analytical methodologies in JMP®. Maintain consistent high-quality performance standards by using process data to drive decision making.
ResultsJMP has provided Samson with invaluable new process knowledge. Samson engineers say JMP has helped catalyze a culture change within the organization; from engineers to supply chain personnel to operators, everyone is now contributing to continuous improvement.

Rope. It’s one of human history’s oldest technologies. Since prehistoric hunter-gatherer societies first braided together fibers of hemp and water reed, humans have been using rope to lift, carry, pull, fasten, attach, secure and climb. In fact, scientists have found fossil evidence of primitive two-ply cordage dating back more than 28,000 years. “Rope is older than the wheel, newer than the sharp stick,” but that doesn’t mean you can’t reinvent it, says Greg Mozsgai, Research and Development Manager at Samson Rope, the world’s leading manufacturer of high-performance ropes.

Over the course of its 140-year history, Samson Rope has earned its stripes by investing in a rigorous R&D program targeted at developing products that solve new and evolving engineering applications. At the year of its inception, Samson’s keystone product combined a traditional braided cord with a central reinforcing core. This principle is still in use today in a variety of products within the company’s now diverse portfolio of specialized technologies, which can be found everywhere from outer space – where it is used by astronauts in the International Space Station – to the bottom of the sea.

Creating new markets and geographies

Though the spirit of invention runs deep at Samson Rope, the motivation to innovate didn’t originate in a vacuum. Like any manufacturer, the company faces a variety of challenges in an increasingly competitive marketplace. But there are also a few quirks unique to being in the business of what Mozsgai calls “old technology.”

The way he sees it, there are two primary challenges:

  1. The need to reach new geographies and industries. Rope making has historically been the purview of small, local operations making just enough rope for one county at a time. But over the last 50 years, Mozsgai says, that has all been changing as modern markets have encouraged global competition. “We still do all of our production in the United States, which is unusual for a big commodity product like ours,” he says. “But it's a challenge because we now have to compete with manufacturers coming out of less expensive local markets.”
  2. The need to differentiate. “Another important challenge is figuring out what can we bring to the table, besides just rope,” explains Mozsgai’s colleague Steve Czupryna, a Quality Process Engineer for Samson Rope. Czupryna explains that Samson strives to differentiate itself as a service provider, rather than just a commodity producer. Hence, the company is working to cultivate relationships within industries that have not historically been consumers of rope at all – from ski lift manufactures to elevators to cranes. “We have to differentiate our products and services on a global level,” Mozsgai adds, and innovation is crucial to staying ahead of competitors.

  • An operator uses a large braider in the Samson Rope factory, circa 1900.


  • Rope braiding machinery, circa 1900.


  • Modern large diameter rope is proof that technology has come a long way in the course of the last century.

Testing and evaluating new designs with data-driven experimentation

Their most formidable R&D challenge to date? One of Samson Rope’s most innovative new products is K-100, the first synthetic fiber rope to be certified for use on industrial cranes. It all began with the recognition of an opportunity; no rope maker had ventured into the crane industry before. “So we first had to understand what happens in the field, the conditions that the ropes would be under,” recalls Czupryna. The next step was to take those factors and design a prototype.

New product design requires a huge amount of testing with Samson’s mammoth crane simulator – a fully instrumented, programmable machine that was built in-house and can run unattended for hours, simulating all the types of operations that take place on a real crane site. “A lot of times when we’re developing a new product, what we have a hard time predicting are some of its secondary characteristics; for example, how well the rope spools onto a winch,” Mozsgai explains. “If we have half a dozen variables that go into the rope design, how will we know which combination of variables will produce something that spools really well?”

This is where a design of experiments (DOE) approach comes in; a targeted, data-driven experimentation plan helps Mozsgai and Czupryna reduce the total number of test runs they must perform, thereby also reducing the overall cost of experimentation. With so many factors to account for, the team relies on JMP® software from SAS to explore and exploit multifactor opportunities through a suite of interactive DOE applications. “Once I started using JMP, there was no comparison,” Mozsgai recalls.

“The attractive part [about JMP] really is the approach to workflow. It's not a toolbox,” Czupryna says. “Minitab is a statistical toolbox; JMP is not…. it gets people thinking, saying, ‘Hey, how about if we slice and dice this data a different way?’ It's this workload that we find to be incredibly valuable as opposed to the toolbox approach.”


  • New prototypes are subjected to tensile strength testing.


  • R&D engineers examine fibers with a microscope to better evaluate product quality.


  • Samson Rope products today are found everywhere from shipping to construction to defense; the company has even manufactured rope for the International Space Station.

Streamlining quality control processes helps reduce waste

“One of the things we've been able to do with JMP is to transform our thought process from a discrete world into a more continuous time-scaled world,” Mozsgai says. Take, for example, the process by which the team tests component material quality. Traditionally, Czupryna says, engineers had to rely on quality certificates or other verification measures to adjudicate whether a shipment met Samson’s quality requirements. But now, he says, “we can take it to the next logical step, which is to bolt all of the suppliers’ data together and get insight into their ability to control processes.” By looking at the data in aggregate over time, engineers can tell which suppliers are most consistent – and consistency is gospel in the rope-making business, where Samson’s products are only as strong as their component fibers allow.

Therein lies another challenge: The best way to quality-test tensile strength is ultimately to destroy the sample product, and that process can be both expensive and wasteful. “You run into this fundamental sampling limit,” Mozsgai says. “It’s not economically feasible to have a very, very high sampling rate because the more we sample, the more we waste. We have a direct material cost to our sampling.”

Fortunately, JMP enables them to build statistical models that help extrapolate test data and gain insight into products that have not been subjected to break-point testing. “We've been able to use JMP to create some pretty slick models,” Mozsgai says. “By lumping our relatively small sample sets together, and interpreting them properly, we can effectively [gain] much better confidence about our product quality without destroying a large percentage of what we create.”

Catalyzing a culture change

Perhaps the most valuable aspect of Samson’s recent transformations, however, isn’t hiding in the data. Rather, it’s the profound cultural sea change that more interactive data analytics has brought with it. Czupryna explains: “JMP process capability, for example, has changed the way (I), the quality group, the production supervisors, even production operators understand the distinction [between the voice of the process and the voice of the customer]. It used to be ‘I'm in spec, I'm good.’ Now, they say, ‘Well, I'm in spec, but am I in control?’ Ah, now we're making progress.”

This kind of critical thinking is valued at all levels of the organization. So when quality technician Canh Khong became concerned about the underutilized brainpower of Samson’s frontline plant operators, he sought a way to improve morale by bringing everyone into the decision-making process. What Khong saw in JMP was a powerful yet accessible tool that could empower operators to not only think creatively about ways to improve measurement and data quality, but also to understand causal relationships within the manufacturing process. And share critically important insights with engineers to make processes better.

“We got people thinking,” Czupryna says of this effort, which later became the subject of a joint conference paper he presented together with Khong. “By turning people into statistical thinkers and data visualizers and abandoners of Excel spreadsheets, we’ve gotten people curious about things. They’re abandoning the daily grind, putting their thinking caps on and contributing to continuous improvement.

“JMP equips us to study things that we took for granted for 140 years. We’ve challenged a lot of status quos and a lot of entrenched habits, and JMP has helped us accelerate that process.”

The results illustrated in this article are specific to the particular situations, business models, data input and computing environments described herein. Each SAS customer’s experience is unique, based on business and technical variables, and all statements must be considered nontypical. Actual savings, results and performance characteristics will vary depending on individual customer configurations and conditions. SAS does not guarantee or represent that every customer will achieve similar results. The only warranties for SAS products and services are those that are set forth in the express warranty statements in the written agreement for such products and services. Nothing herein should be construed as constituting an additional warranty. Customers have shared their successes with SAS as part of an agreed-upon contractual exchange or project success summarization following a successful implementation of SAS software.