Findings Time Trends

The Findings Time Trends report allows findings data, typically laboratory tests, to be summarized over time by treatment. Time typically involves both visits and time points. By default, the summarization for laboratory tests involves calculating the mean change from baseline and 95% confidence intervals, to determine whether laboratory test mean post-baseline values are trending up or down across visits. Other summarizations include the percent change from baseline and percent of baseline as well as the observed results, the latter including the upper limit of normal and lower limit of normal cutoff lines for the individual tests. A line graph with the means of each treatment group are displayed first, with a bar graph below, showing the number of records for the subjects containing the baseline and post-baseline values involved in the calculations. Finally, a line graph for each laboratory test for each subject over visit is displayed, allowing the investigator to evaluate each data point for every subject on the trial.

Methodology

No testing is performed. Analysis is restricted to calculating simple statistics of post-baseline findings results or their log transformed and/or normalized values against baseline values.

If findings test category (xxCAT) exists (where xx represents the two-letter domain abbreviation -- for example, LB), plots are first ordered by xxCAT. Next, if findings test subcategory (xxSCAT) exists, plots are secondarily ordered by xxSCAT. If xxCAT is missing, plots are ordered by test short name (xxTESTCD), which is required. Findings tests with a missing xxCAT value are assigned to the “OTHER” category.

Note: Findings tests with a missing numeric result (xxSTRESN), as well as those taken on only one day, are excluded from these plots.

Tip: You can collapse categories (and simultaneously exclude them from any report that you create) by clicking on the gray triangles located to the left of the category labels.

Each plot displays the measurements taken across time for each subject in a study for a quantitative findings test. The value of xxTEST is displayed in the outline box for each plot and the test short name (xxTESTCD) is displayed along with the measurement units (where applicable) on the Y axis. The Y axis can represent the observed test result, the change from baseline, percent change from baseline, or percent of baseline, depending on the selection made for the Plot findings measurements as: parameter on the report dialog. Time, as either Study Day, Study Week, or Visit, is plotted on the X axis (according to yourTime Scale selection). Time trend lines connect the points of measurement; each marker point represents the findings measurement for each subject at the measured time point. If multiple measurements were taken for a subject on the same Study Day, Study Week, or Visit, the point represents the mean measurement for that subject.

Usage and Interpretation

The Findings Time Trends report was run with Nicardipine sample data set under several scenarios to demonstrate usage and interpretation of results.

Note: Click on the figures below to enlarge.

Example 1: Mean Change from Baseline in BUN Over Time by Treatment

In this example, report options were set as shown in the following table:

Option Settings
Option Type Option Setting  
Display Laboratory Test Results Blood Urea Nitrogen (mMol/L)
All other options set to default.

Laboratory Test Results (LB) is the selected domain, unscheduled visits have been excluded, and the baseline value is calculated based on the baseline flag. Change from baseline is the selected finding measurement.

This report example summarizes the change from baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN). It allows us to evaluate average within-subject changes over time and compare trends across treatment groups for BUN measurements taken across the study. While no statistical testing is performed, there are 95% confidence intervals included around the mean changes for each of the treatment groups to evaluate the potential treatment differences at each follow-up visit. The number of records included in each mean is summarized in a bar chart below the graph.

Figure 1: Mean Change from Baseline for BUN

In this example we observe (Figure 1) that the mean BUN compared to baseline increased slightly over time in all treatment groups, with the Nicardipine treatment showing modestly greater increases compared with placebo. The mean change in the Nicardipine group ranged from 0.3 to 4.6 mmol/L over the study follow-up period. Differences between the Nicardipine and placebo groups were small and accompanied by overlapping variability, suggesting no clear or clinically meaningful separation. The gradual increase over time may indicate a mild cumulative effect; however, the magnitude of change is limited and should be interpreted with consideration of possible influential outliers as well as in context with other renal markers such as creatinine and eGFR.

Figure 2: BUN Change from Baseline for All Subjects

The all-subjects plot shown in this report (Figure 2) gives individual subject trajectories of BUN change from baseline values over time. This plot (also known as a spaghetti plot) shows the wide spread of values indicating heterogeneity across subjects. There appear to be individuals with larger increases in BUN compared with the majority which influence the upward shift in the mean observed in the mean change from baseline plot. This reinforces that the observed mean differences are likely small relative to with-group variability and appear to be driven by a small subset of subjects, rather than a consistent shift across the cohort.

 

The interactive nature of these plots allows the user to select a line or point on the graph to identify the subject or group of subjects included in that graphed element. The user can then create a subject filter on the selected subject(s) to do further exploration. Subjects with the largest increases may be of interest to evaluate further in the context of other renal safety markers and adverse event profiles.

Figure 3:  

In this example, we selected two lines (use shift click to select multiple items) in the all-subjects graphs (bold lines in Figure 3) and then clicked Show Subjects () which surfaced a window listing the selected subjects. Further exploration of these subjects’ safety profiles can then be done using the Review Subject Filter with other JMPClinical Safety reports, such as Acute Kidney Injury, Patient Profiles and the various Adverse Events reports.

Example 2. Mean Observed Result for Bilirubin (mMol/L) over Time by Treatment

Options

Data

Treatment or Comparison Variable

Domain

Findings Tests

Show all Findings Tests

By Variables

Plot findings measurements as:

Remove unscheduled visits

Include missing visits/time points

Calculate baseline as:

Snapshot Records to Include

Additional Filters - Findings

Display

Test Results/Vital Signs

Action Buttons

Action buttons provide you with an easy way to drill down into your data. The following action buttons are generated by this report:

Default Settings

Refer to Set Study Preferences for default Subject Level settings.