Co-occurrence

The Co-occurrence report enables users to explore pairs of occurrences, including adverse events (AE), concomitant medications (CM), and deaths, that occur within the same patient and overlap in time. The report estimates the durationof overlap in days for each occurrence pair. Users can compare the overlap of occurrences to the marginal frequencies where occurrences happen individually. Occurrence pairs will be presented by treatment to assess if certain pairs occur more frequently than others within specific treatments or to compare the amount of time pairs occur together within treatment. This report evaluates occurrences from multiple sources, including adverse events from the AE domain, concomitant medications from the CM domain, or deaths identified by the presence of a death date in either DM or ADSL.

Unlike the Nearby Occurrences report that requires users to identify one or more reference occurrences of interest and then examine other occurrences that fall within a user-defined time window, Co-occurrence evaluates all possible pairs of occurrences that match the Term of Interest and identifies those that overlap in time within a patient. The Nearby Occurrences report is best suited for investigating specific terms of interest, whereas the Co-occurrence report examines overlap for all terms to see what relationships might arise.

Methodology

Pairs are built from potentially multiple instances of the individual components present in the data. In other words, when records are joined, two or more potentially overlapping periods involving the same Terms of Interest (for example, phenobarbital and dexamethasone) might be identified within a study. However, the current implementation does not attempt to identify or distinguish separate overlap periods between the same pair of Terms of Interest. The Number of Days of Overlap is the frequency of unique study days where both Terms of Interest in an Occurrence Group (currently limited to pairs) are observed together.

No attempt is made to assess overlap at the time-of-day level. If two Terms of Interest occur on the same study day, they are considered to overlap with each other.

In practice, missing dates for deaths and AEs are unlikely to occur. However, medications used to treat chronic disease might have unknown starts dates (indicating that the medication was initiated in the distant past) or unknown end dates (implying that the medication is ongoing). Although JMP Clinical makes every effort to impute partial dates according to predefined rules, completely missing dates might still occur in some cases. When start or end dates are missing entirely, they will be imputed using the earliest or latest possible date based on the following rules, evaluated in the order shown according to variable availability:

• Start date: Enrollment date (ENRLDT), informed consent date (RFICDT), or earliest visit start date (JMPC_ASTDT)
• End date: End of study date (EOSDT), end of participation date (RFPENDT), latest visit end date (JMPC_AENDT), or disposition event dates (JMPC_ASTDT).

For instances where stop dates for medications or AEs were not collected as part of the eCRF design, the stop dates are assumed to be the same as the start dates. In other words, the occurrences start and end on the same study day. This assumption is always applied to deaths.

For all studies, occurrences are classified according to the treatment arm, including all treatments for crossover or multi-treatment studies. A potential enhancement of the Co-occurrence report would be to assess the overlap of pairs of Terms of Interest in the context of the treatment being received on a given study day, including periods during which no treatment is administered.

Usage and Interpretation

The primary output is an UpSet Plot, which contains several key components for interpreting the results. UpSet plots are used to communicate the frequencies of subgroups defined by one or more factors and to compare these marginal frequencies with the marginal frequencies of each factor considered individually.

Example 1: Default Settings

Options

Data - Adverse Events

Term Level

Include serious adverse events only

Event Type

Ignore available treatment emergent flags

Data - Concomitant Medications

Term Level

Intervention Type

Truncate data to the start of the study

Display

Upset Format

Term of Interest

Frequencies by Treatment

Report Filter

Action Buttons

Action buttons provide you with an easy way to drill down into your data. The following action buttons are generated by this report:

• Click to reset all report options to default settings.
• Click to view the associated data tables. Refer to Show Tables for more information.
• Click to generate a standardized PDF- or RTF-formatted report that contains the plots and charts of selected sections.
• Click to generate a JMP Live report. Refer to Create Live Report for more information.
• Click to take notes and store them in a central location. Refer to Add Notes for more information.
• Click to read user-generated notes. Refer to View Notes for more information.

Default Settings

Refer to Set Study Preferences for default Subject Level settings.

References

Mallet S. (2023). Interactive Safety Graphics for Regulatory Decision Making: Opportunities and Challenges. PhUSE Webinar.

Ballarini NM, et al. (2020). A critical review of graphics for subgroup analyses in clinical trials. Pharmaceutical Statistics 19: 541–560.